Kyle Storer now banned for nine games...

Talk about anything to do with Cheltenham Town, CTFC 500 Club, League 1, ex players & Managers

Moderators: Admin, Ralph, asl, Robin

James from the Echo
Posts: 330
Joined: 05 Nov 2013, 17:25
Because of a farcical FA and EFL rule twist - full story here: http://bit.ly/StorerNine" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Hubert Parry
Posts: 2443
Joined: 22 Jul 2011, 09:09
Joke. The rules are incongruous. To make a point, my team would be:

Kitscha
Lymn
Parslow
Bower
Jennings
Barthram
Whitehead
Rowe
Morgan-Smith
Arthur
Smith
User avatar
Nesty
Posts: 6657
Joined: 18 Jun 2011, 09:17
Its farcical that the game will not count yet he (Storer) presumably wouldnt be allowed to play in it, its ............. farcical
User avatar
Malabus
Posts: 13348
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 12:26
Location: The Death Star.
They hate us. We should be used to it by now.
RegencyCheltenhamSpa
Posts: 29814
Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Absolute joke. Just as nonsensical as the Woking Trophy debacle last season.

I hope GJ boycotts the competition and just sends Russell and the youth team up to make a point.
darreno
Posts: 369
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 13:47
Sorry folks, but the committed a heinous error of judgment and must take his punishment. Mo defence for what he did.
User avatar
Reliant Robin
Posts: 1366
Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 21:10
darreno wrote:Sorry folks, but the committed a heinous error of judgment and must take his punishment. Mo defence for what he did.
It was a Sincil ly thing to do, but the Imp udent yellow-belly was laying on top of him & Stoz reacted on the spur of the moment - he's apologised but is still being punished. It's not fair.
User avatar
Horteng
Posts: 3163
Joined: 25 Nov 2009, 22:57
Location: Heart of the Forest, Glos
It's a farce but he's only hot himself to blame for being in the position he's in.
everyman
Posts: 2044
Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 09:11
Horteng wrote:It's a farce but he's only hot himself to blame for being in the position he's in.
If he had taken his teeth out it would have been a kiss and the p.c. police couldn`t have banned him ?
RegencyCheltenhamSpa
Posts: 29814
Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
darreno wrote:Sorry folks, but the committed a heinous error of judgment and must take his punishment. Mo defence for what he did.
And he was taking his 8 game punishment with no complaint. It is the late alteration to the rules and the lengthening of the ban which is farcical.

I would play Storer in the Trophy game. If they kick us out of the competition: good.

Nonsensical Tinpot Trophy rules on the hoof had potential to disrupt us last season. And again this season. As Mal says, any excuse to try and screw CTFC over.
Si Robin
Posts: 5405
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 10:29
The problem is, they won't kick us out, they'll fine us and the club simply can't afford the fine just to make a point.
dedwardp
Posts: 19
Joined: 02 Feb 2015, 15:58
If his ban doesn't count in this particular fixture and therefore use up a suspended game, then surely that means he is eligible to play?
RegencyCheltenhamSpa
Posts: 29814
Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
dedwardp wrote:If his ban doesn't count in this particular fixture and therefore use up a suspended game, then surely that means he is eligible to play?
That is what we are so frustrated by. They it doesn't count as one of the eight games, yet also say he cannot play. So he is being banned for nine games.

A shambles, just for the sake of keeping bigger clubs' U21 sides happy.
dedwardp
Posts: 19
Joined: 02 Feb 2015, 15:58
Says who though? An eight game ban is an eight game ban, surely it can't just be extended to a ninth game at the last minute?

Hartlepool seem to think their suspension doesn't count on Tuesday night: http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/sport/ ... _game_ban/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

There's clearly only one rule though, so which is it?
RegencyCheltenhamSpa
Posts: 29814
Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
[quote="dedwardp"]Says who though? An eight game ban is an eight game ban, surely it can't just be extended to a ninth game at the last minute?

Hartlepool seem to think their suspension doesn't count on Tuesday night: http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/sport/ ... _game_ban/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

There's clearly only one rule though, so which is it?[/quote]

Say the authorities according to the Echo article in the first post.

"The match was originally thought to be the eighth and final game of Storer's suspension, but a bizarre twist in the rules means it's not counted as a first team fixture by the FA.

When the Trophy was expanded to allow Premier League Academy teams in for this year, the 16 invited clubs insisted that it be regarded as a reserve team competition.

The big boys didn't want to run the risk of having young players pick up suspensions in the competition so insisted games were not regarded fist team fixtures and the FA agreed.

The Robins originally thought (and the Echo understands were told) that Storer would therefore be free to play in the Blackpool game, only for the authorities to then perform an immediate u-turn.

But under the terms of his suspension he is unable to play until the Robins have played eight first team games.

And because the FA don't regard the Checkatrade Trophy as a first team competition, it means Tuesday's game doesn't count against the ban and means that Storer is now unavailable for Saturday's League Two game at Plymouth Argyle."
User avatar
Malabus
Posts: 13348
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 12:26
Location: The Death Star.
dedwardp wrote:If his ban doesn't count in this particular fixture and therefore use up a suspended game, then surely that means he is eligible to play?
If this game don't count; then it devalues the competition.
Red Duke
Posts: 2000
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 09:15
Location: North West
Isn't there a rule in this competition that a certain numbers of players (I think it is six) that played on Saturday must be in the starting XI?

So if it is not a first team fixture, does this rule no longer apply?
User avatar
Malabus
Posts: 13348
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 12:26
Location: The Death Star.
Red Duke wrote:Isn't there a rule in this competition that a certain numbers of players (I think it is six) that played on Saturday must be in the starting XI?

So if it is not a first team fixture, does this rule no longer apply?
5 or 6 players. That's correct.
RegencyCheltenhamSpa
Posts: 29814
Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
The EFL would not get very good reviews on Checkatrade.
RegencyCheltenhamSpa
Posts: 29814
Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
From the EFL rules:

"Each EFL Club shall play its full available strength in and during all Matches. The League will from time to time issue a policy as to what constitutes 'full available strength'. Any Club failing to meet this requirement will be required to pay a fine of up to £5,000."

http://www.efl.com/global/trophyrules.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Harsh and inconsistent rules for the majority of small clubs who face punishment. Other rules changed at the request of/for the benefit of the minority of large clubs, disregarding evidence and common sense. That is how the economy and society works in feudal/oligarch Britain so we should not expect football to be any different.
everyman
Posts: 2044
Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 09:11
Malabus wrote:They hate us. We should be used to it by now.
Let`s just win all three games and take the £30,000 win bonus.
Red Duke
Posts: 2000
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 09:15
Location: North West
Reading this:

http://www.efl.com/news/article/2016/ch ... 79215.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

It states "Any EFL or Premier League player who is serving a ban or is set to serve a suspension for a yellow or red card offence will be eligible to play in this week’s opening group games in the Checkatrade Trophy".

So according to that Kyle Storer can play at Blackpool.
User avatar
Shade
Posts: 16976
Joined: 27 Sep 2010, 13:02
Location: Cheltenhamshire
I think we should just stick him in the team and the shove that down the FA's throats if they try anything.
Post Reply