Crawley Town v Cheltenham Town
Moderators: Admin, Ralph, asl, Robin
- Hubert Parry
- Posts: 2443
- Joined: 22 Jul 2011, 09:09
It is nothing to do our mentality. We are ultimately a League 2 team, with League 2 players, who make League 2 decisions. There is a reason why we are currently top of the league and that is because we have been the most consistent. Sometimes we are not on our game and that is not necessarily down to our mental strength or effort.
Looking at Twitter mainly, but why do we always meltdown every time we lose? If we go up, it is going to be a very painful season if that is people's benchmark.
Looking at Twitter mainly, but why do we always meltdown every time we lose? If we go up, it is going to be a very painful season if that is people's benchmark.
Mentally we are not capable to compete away from home the evidence is there to see.Hubert Parry wrote:It is nothing to do our mentality. We are ultimately a League 2 team, with League 2 players, who make League 2 decisions. There is a reason why we are currently top of the league and that is because we have been the most consistent. Sometimes we are not on our game and that is not necessarily down to our mental strength or effort.
Looking at Twitter mainly, but why do we always meltdown every time we lose? If we go up, it is going to be a very painful season if that is people's benchmark.
Barrow; Mansfield, Morecambe, Grimsby and Crawley have been complete disasters for a team JUST hanging top of the table.
If we claim a top three finish then we have been very lucky.
-
- Posts: 29817
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
What about winning away at Exeter and Cambridge etc?Malabus wrote:Mentally we are not capable to compete away from home the evidence is there to see.Hubert Parry wrote:It is nothing to do our mentality. We are ultimately a League 2 team, with League 2 players, who make League 2 decisions. There is a reason why we are currently top of the league and that is because we have been the most consistent. Sometimes we are not on our game and that is not necessarily down to our mental strength or effort.
Looking at Twitter mainly, but why do we always meltdown every time we lose? If we go up, it is going to be a very painful season if that is people's benchmark.
Barrow; Mansfield, Morecambe, Grimsby and Crawley have been complete disasters for a team JUST hanging top of the table.
If we claim a top three finish then we have been very lucky.
Top three is a near certainty.
I think that’s right. We get the ball to the edge of the box so many times but just don’t have that little bit of quality to take it further. We’ve done incredibly well to be on top of the league considering we don’t always make the best of these chances.Shade wrote:We don't have anyone that can make something happen. At no point did you think anyone at all was going to get on the ball and beat someone. And it's so obvious when we aren't going to score.
JUST winning at those venues, not convincing enough for me.RegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:What about winning away at Exeter and Cambridge etc?Malabus wrote:Mentally we are not capable to compete away from home the evidence is there to see.Hubert Parry wrote:It is nothing to do our mentality. We are ultimately a League 2 team, with League 2 players, who make League 2 decisions. There is a reason why we are currently top of the league and that is because we have been the most consistent. Sometimes we are not on our game and that is not necessarily down to our mental strength or effort.
Looking at Twitter mainly, but why do we always meltdown every time we lose? If we go up, it is going to be a very painful season if that is people's benchmark.
Barrow; Mansfield, Morecambe, Grimsby and Crawley have been complete disasters for a team JUST hanging top of the table.
If we claim a top three finish then we have been very lucky.
Top three is a near certainty.
I could write the script on what will happen at Stevenage and Newport, the script is simple : WE WONT TURN UP!
-
- Posts: 29817
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Sorry that a team top of the league after 41 games with the joint fewest losses and joint most wins is depressing for you Mal.
Amazing how people are feeling about one of, of not the, best season the club as ever had.
Next season in L1 is going to be harder....are you and the Twitter morons going to be like this every week?
Amazing how people are feeling about one of, of not the, best season the club as ever had.
Next season in L1 is going to be harder....are you and the Twitter morons going to be like this every week?
-
- Posts: 29817
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
I can picture the scene in a few weeks...players celebrating promotion, fans celebrating promotion, pundits giving us praise, Mal at home typing in capslock on the internet “but we lost some matches!”
We are heading for another play off campaign.....remember the last one, weak minded individualsRegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:I can picture the scene in a few weeks...players celebrating promotion, fans celebrating promotion, pundits giving us praise, Mal at home typing in capslock on the internet “but we lost some matches!”
-
- Posts: 29817
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
RNF..remind me of this post in a few weeks time.Malabus wrote:We are heading for another play off campaign.....remember the last one, weak minded individualsRegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:I can picture the scene in a few weeks...players celebrating promotion, fans celebrating promotion, pundits giving us praise, Mal at home typing in capslock on the internet “but we lost some matches!”
After thinking about it for a couple of hours, I can see what both Mal and RCS are saying. Tonight was disappointing and not the performance of potential champions or automatic promotion candidates. 5 more performances like that and we'll barely make the playoffs.
However - big picture, we are where we are after 41 games because we must be a good side at this level. We've won pretty much every game following a loss, which shows good mental strength. We also still only need 9 points maximum for promotion - if each of the chasing pack lose only once in their final 5, we only need 6 points. If we fail to get that then I think we'll all agree it's an even bigger bottle job than last year.
However - big picture, we are where we are after 41 games because we must be a good side at this level. We've won pretty much every game following a loss, which shows good mental strength. We also still only need 9 points maximum for promotion - if each of the chasing pack lose only once in their final 5, we only need 6 points. If we fail to get that then I think we'll all agree it's an even bigger bottle job than last year.
-
- Posts: 29817
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Indeed. And we have seen all season that we are not a team to bottle it - as you say, we nearly always follow up a defeat with a win. Win two and lose two and we will be up with a game to spare imo.CTFCfan99 wrote:After thinking about it for a couple of hours, I can see what both Mal and RCS are saying. Tonight was disappointing and not the performance of potential champions or automatic promotion candidates. 5 more performances like that and we'll barely make the playoffs.
However - big picture, we are where we are after 41 games because we must be a good side at this level. We've won pretty much every game following a loss, which shows good mental strength. We also still only need 9 points maximum for promotion - if each of the chasing pack lose only once in their final 5, we only need 6 points. If we fail to get that then I think we'll all agree it's an even bigger bottle job than last year.
- Hubert Parry
- Posts: 2443
- Joined: 22 Jul 2011, 09:09
Clichés get in the way here as well, the same old "champions find a way to win these games" etc. It's all nonsense. Champions find a way to win more of those games than their rivals.
In our NL title winning season, we dropped some terrible points - Eastleigh, Welling, Altrincham, Wrexham etc. The point is that we had fewer of those than the rest.
In our NL title winning season, we dropped some terrible points - Eastleigh, Welling, Altrincham, Wrexham etc. The point is that we had fewer of those than the rest.
-
- Posts: 29817
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
I can’t wait until “we are only promoted because other teams lost” clichés come out over the next few weeks when Tranmere and Morecambe continue to drop points.Hubert Parry wrote:Clichés get in the way here as well, the same old "champions find a way to win these games" etc. It's all nonsense. Champions find a way to win more of those games than their rivals.
In our NL title winning season, we dropped some terrible points - Eastleigh, Welling, Altrincham, Wrexham etc. The point is that we had fewer of those than the rest.
I mean, as you say, league tables literally work by the teams who win the most points finishing at the top, so I never understand why rivals dropping points is a bad thing!
Michael doesn`t seem to trust Lloyd, i expect he will be made available to other clubs in the summer.RegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:Scrappy game. Someone should have put one of the throw-in scrambles in the net - just put your foot through it.
But what a let off that was.
Be nice to see Lloyd later.
He needs to be playing games for his own good.
Lack of pace evident all season up front and midfield, the only player able to get behind a defence lacked the ablity to provide goals/assists.Alf wrote:Much as I admire our passing game, often by the time we get to the opponents box they have every angle covered. Bit of a slack performance.
-
- Posts: 3928
- Joined: 04 Aug 2011, 11:02
What is the point of Vassilev? Totally anonymous again. Lloyd would have got stuck in. Long and Hussey struggled when a winger( remember them?) came on. We are still well placed .The Manager was correct that we failed in every department but last night so did he. It was a mess.
-
- Posts: 29817
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
In fairness, once again Indy was brought on when we were panicking so had no shape, no system and no understanding.horlickfanclub wrote:What is the point of Vassilev? Totally anonymous again. Lloyd would have got stuck in. Long and Hussey struggled when a winger( remember them?) came on. We are still well placed .The Manager was correct that we failed in every department but last night so did he. It was a mess.
I would still like to see Indy start a game so we can see how he looks when we are set up and playing properly.
- Hubert Parry
- Posts: 2443
- Joined: 22 Jul 2011, 09:09
May and Lloyd both have pace. Pace is not the problem up front. Our best pressing comes from our speed up top. Our problem yesterday was our inability to make the correct passing and running decisions in the final third.everyman wrote:Lack of pace evident all season up front and midfield, the only player able to get behind a defence lacked the ablity to provide goals/assists.Alf wrote:Much as I admire our passing game, often by the time we get to the opponents box they have every angle covered. Bit of a slack performance.
- Hubert Parry
- Posts: 2443
- Joined: 22 Jul 2011, 09:09
I agree, he is the only one who has not been given a proper opportunity. He would start for me on Tuesday with Sam Smith probably. Whilst I don't want to go full Mark Cooper and make changes for punitive reasons or for the sake of it, too many of the forwards have simply not merited a start. If we do go up, I should be fascinated to see how many other teams in EFL have gone up with such goal shy forwards.RegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:In fairness, once again Indy was brought on when we were panicking so had no shape, no system and no understanding.horlickfanclub wrote:What is the point of Vassilev? Totally anonymous again. Lloyd would have got stuck in. Long and Hussey struggled when a winger( remember them?) came on. We are still well placed .The Manager was correct that we failed in every department but last night so did he. It was a mess.
I would still like to see Indy start a game so we can see how he looks when we are set up and playing properly.
Just to add to that, I think we are comfortably top on XG, which further emphasises the point that we are energetically wasteful going forward.
-
- Posts: 3928
- Joined: 04 Aug 2011, 11:02
Usually players earn a start by showing an ability to get involved . I have seen nothing in him that gives me hope. Happy to be proved wrong but at c. 860 minutes played in the League and no goals those here that like "numbers" and I might wait a long time.
-
- Posts: 29817
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
See above two posts. Nearly all of those minutes have been in small chunks where the team is ragged with no shape.horlickfanclub wrote:Usually players earn a start by showing an ability to get involved . I have seen nothing in him that gives me hope. Happy to be proved wrong but at c. 860 minutes played in the League and no goals those here that like "numbers" and I might wait a long time.
Neither you or I have seen the numbers on speed, sprints, distance, heart rate etc. Duff has, and if Duff starts him it will be because he feels he can do the job required in our system and shape.
Maybe not. Your new favourite club bottled at basement team Grimsby!Malabus wrote:We are heading for another play off campaign.....remember the last one, weak minded individualsRegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:I can picture the scene in a few weeks...players celebrating promotion, fans celebrating promotion, pundits giving us praise, Mal at home typing in capslock on the internet “but we lost some matches!”
-
- Posts: 898
- Joined: 25 Nov 2010, 16:00
If we struggle next season it’ll most likely be due to a lack of a clinical goal scorer. We have got away with it this season due to our solid defence, but we rarely come back from a goal down.
I think our defence is good enough for League 1 but our forwards most definitely are not. We need to somehow find a cheap but good striker.... a very tough ask.
I think our defence is good enough for League 1 but our forwards most definitely are not. We need to somehow find a cheap but good striker.... a very tough ask.
I don’t think there’s such a thing as a good cheap striker.robinsrule wrote:If we struggle next season it’ll most likely be due to a lack of a clinical goal scorer. We have got away with it this season due to our solid defence, but we rarely come back from a goal down.
I think our defence is good enough for League 1 but our forwards most definitely are not. We need to somehow find a cheap but good striker.... a very tough ask.
Although Mo only has 1 goal in 25 games for Peterborough in the league this seasonShade wrote:We need a bit of luck in finding another Eisa. OK, a lot of.luck.
As RCS says I'm hoping for another Varney type signing who might rub off on May and Lloyd (assuming Smith and Williams leave this summer)
Seeing Eisa mentioned, who would be the last player who moved on but actually did anything? Would it be Pack? I’m excluding Winchester as I think the jury is out.
Those who I can think of who haven’t done well would be Broom, Eisa, The Duffus brothers.
Those who I can think of who haven’t done well would be Broom, Eisa, The Duffus brothers.