Big gate and it felt like going to a proper football match before the game with the numbers milling around outside and in bars/fan zones.
Reading brought 1,516.
So 4,425 home fans.
Fewer home fans than the 4,553 on Boxing Day.
5,941
Moderators: Admin, Ralph, asl, Robin
Yes, so the availability or not of seats made no difference…but by giving reading more seats the home ends were more crowded and therefore a better atmosphere.
Funny - with my plan of swapping ends reading would’ve have had 2,200 tickets and we’d have had more seats. So todays attendance would’ve been about 6,600
Worth thinking about
Funny - with my plan of swapping ends reading would’ve have had 2,200 tickets and we’d have had more seats. So todays attendance would’ve been about 6,600
Worth thinking about
-
- Posts: 29852
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Availability of seats did make a difference. We had fewer home fans than the last game, whilst many fans who want to sit were unable to attend. We could have seen over 4,750 home fans I reckon, had we given the home stand to home fans rather than away.Ben3 wrote: ↑29 Dec 2023, 22:47 Yes, so the availability or not of seats made no difference…but by giving reading more seats the home ends were more crowded and therefore a better atmosphere.
Funny - with my plan of swapping ends reading would’ve have had 2,200 tickets and we’d have had more seats. So todays attendance would’ve been about 6,600
Worth thinking about
-
- Posts: 1728
- Joined: 15 Aug 2011, 16:40
Biggest crowd since……when? I don’t think I’ve see a Cheltenham attendance starting with a 6 since Everton in the cup.
We do seem to have a glass ceiling where we can't get over 6000 for a league game but as others have said that's very likely down to the lack of seats. If we had bigger capacity I'm sure overall attendance would have been higher tonight, is it worth maybe putting a temp stand in the paddock/canteen area even if it only holds around 500 it would be used for the big games.
-
- Posts: 29852
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Even if it only holds 200 or 300 it is worth doing. Put away fans in it and get them out the Colin Farmer.Robin wrote: ↑29 Dec 2023, 23:34 We do seem to have a glass ceiling where we can't get over 6000 for a league game but as others have said that's very likely down to the lack of seats. If we had bigger capacity I'm sure overall attendance would have been higher tonight, is it worth maybe putting a temp stand in the paddock/canteen area even if it only holds around 500 it would be used for the big games.
Biggest since last seasons game vs fgr I expect. 5,901 with 700 away fans.Jerry St Clair wrote: ↑29 Dec 2023, 23:21 Biggest crowd since……when? I don’t think I’ve see a Cheltenham attendance starting with a 6 since Everton in the cup.
5,200 home fans which is probably the biggest we've had in a a FL game which isn't a playoff game.
We had 7300 vs Leeds in a league game and around 6500 vs Brighton, also 7000 vs Oxford all for league games that come to my mind.CS85 wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 08:24Biggest since last seasons game vs fgr I expect. 5,901 with 700 away fans.Jerry St Clair wrote: ↑29 Dec 2023, 23:21 Biggest crowd since……when? I don’t think I’ve see a Cheltenham attendance starting with a 6 since Everton in the cup.
5,200 home fans which is probably the biggest we've had in a a FL game which isn't a playoff game.
-
- Posts: 1728
- Joined: 15 Aug 2011, 16:40
If we had a shiny main stand holding 2500, there’s no doubt in my mind we’d have had 7000+ there last night. Good facilities make a huge difference.RegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote: ↑29 Dec 2023, 22:56Availability of seats did make a difference. We had fewer home fans than the last game, whilst many fans who want to sit were unable to attend. We could have seen over 4,750 home fans I reckon, had we given the home stand to home fans rather than away.Ben3 wrote: ↑29 Dec 2023, 22:47 Yes, so the availability or not of seats made no difference…but by giving reading more seats the home ends were more crowded and therefore a better atmosphere.
Funny - with my plan of swapping ends reading would’ve have had 2,200 tickets and we’d have had more seats. So todays attendance would’ve been about 6,600
Worth thinking about
The board really do need to find a way to build a new main stand but I would question their ambition if it were to only hold 2500 that would only increase overall capacity by around five hundred. Would need to be 3000 as an absolute minimum in my opinion.
-
- Posts: 1728
- Joined: 15 Aug 2011, 16:40
Yeah, and I suspect the cost difference between 2500 and 3000 wouldn’t be all that much anyway.
That area infront of the paddock canteen is so non-league ,surely a section of steel terracing like the one behind the goal at Evesham would improve the view for fans there.The canteen could stand on the unused little patio near the entrance there.Robin wrote: ↑29 Dec 2023, 23:34 We do seem to have a glass ceiling where we can't get over 6000 for a league game but as others have said that's very likely down to the lack of seats. If we had bigger capacity I'm sure overall attendance would have been higher tonight, is it worth maybe putting a temp stand in the paddock/canteen area even if it only holds around 500 it would be used for the big games.
On the last trust podcast they said it would cost £12m to build a new main stand, which would be impossible without investment. Need to do something like a joint venture with the council or uni.... or sell Goodwin for £15m after he finishes the season with 35 goals!
Agreed,barrow have put in two temp seating stands either side of their main stand,surely we can fit one in there to give fans a better view.everyman wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 10:48That area infront of the paddock canteen is so non-league ,surely a section of steel terracing like the one behind the goal at Evesham would improve the view for fans there.The canteen could stand on the unused little patio near the entrance there.Robin wrote: ↑29 Dec 2023, 23:34 We do seem to have a glass ceiling where we can't get over 6000 for a league game but as others have said that's very likely down to the lack of seats. If we had bigger capacity I'm sure overall attendance would have been higher tonight, is it worth maybe putting a temp stand in the paddock/canteen area even if it only holds around 500 it would be used for the big games.
Biggest since 5,975 against Argyle on Boxing Day last seasonCS85 wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 08:24Biggest since last seasons game vs fgr I expect. 5,901 with 700 away fans.Jerry St Clair wrote: ↑29 Dec 2023, 23:21 Biggest crowd since……when? I don’t think I’ve see a Cheltenham attendance starting with a 6 since Everton in the cup.
5,200 home fans which is probably the biggest we've had in a a FL game which isn't a playoff game.
A few of us have mentioned all this previously on here, but Dave Bloxsome seemed to say he doesn't favour a sticking plaster solution.CS85 wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 11:15Agreed,barrow have put in two temp seating stands either side of their main stand,surely we can fit one in there to give fans a better view.everyman wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 10:48That area infront of the paddock canteen is so non-league ,surely a section of steel terracing like the one behind the goal at Evesham would improve the view for fans there.The canteen could stand on the unused little patio near the entrance there.Robin wrote: ↑29 Dec 2023, 23:34 We do seem to have a glass ceiling where we can't get over 6000 for a league game but as others have said that's very likely down to the lack of seats. If we had bigger capacity I'm sure overall attendance would have been higher tonight, is it worth maybe putting a temp stand in the paddock/canteen area even if it only holds around 500 it would be used for the big games.
It would be good to know if the board have at least looked into various options and if they aren't viable well just tell us.
-
- Posts: 666
- Joined: 17 Aug 2021, 12:02
Yes its very frustrating, as you say he seems to not like the sticking plaster option but there appears to be no ambition to do the full rebuild until we magic up circa £12m which is not going to happen. So is it really a sticking plaster if it lasts 5, 6, 7 or 10 years?!paperboy wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 12:26A few of us have mentioned all this previously on here, but Dave Bloxsome seemed to say he doesn't favour a sticking plaster solution.
It would be good to know if the board have at least looked into various options and if they aren't viable well just tell us.
The extra income of 500 or so seats will surely pay for itself over a mid to long term period?
The thing is aswell,the open terrace on the side (cng end) could be flattened levelled out and a fairly deep,steep...covered!! temp terrace could be put there.
Whilst I appreciate the majority are volunteers and cash is tight the club need to be more proactive when it comes to simple upgrades and facilities for the fans.
Whilst I appreciate the majority are volunteers and cash is tight the club need to be more proactive when it comes to simple upgrades and facilities for the fans.
-
- Posts: 3197
- Joined: 06 Dec 2009, 15:48
Maybe the modular stands we’ve seen a growth in would be the way to go?
It seems to be increasing in popularity in the EFL with 3/4 of Wimbledon’s new stadium is built that way, one stand at Accrington and the whole of Salfords done using that method (RCS might know more but I’m sure both ends at Fulham were done that way too)
The club could keep the existing core of main stand and add a modular wing of seats either end and to to the front but a solution like that could add 1000 or so more seats.
It seems to be increasing in popularity in the EFL with 3/4 of Wimbledon’s new stadium is built that way, one stand at Accrington and the whole of Salfords done using that method (RCS might know more but I’m sure both ends at Fulham were done that way too)
The club could keep the existing core of main stand and add a modular wing of seats either end and to to the front but a solution like that could add 1000 or so more seats.
-
- Posts: 29852
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
The Hammersmith End at Fulham is pretty basic. A glorified temporary stand type structure, like that seen at the County Ground Bristol in places, and the Cheltenham Cricket Festival.London Exile wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 14:17 Maybe the modular stands we’ve seen a growth in would be the way to go?
It seems to be increasing in popularity in the EFL with 3/4 of Wimbledon’s new stadium is built that way, one stand at Accrington and the whole of Salfords done using that method (RCS might know more but I’m sure both ends at Fulham were done that way too)
The club could keep the existing core of main stand and add a modular wing of seats either end and to to the front but a solution like that could add 1000 or so more seats.
It was sort of built over the existing terrace, so a lot of the foundations and roof structures were in place.
There is no concourse per se, just the area behind the stand. The toilets are Victorian style gutter at the bottom of the outer brick wall of the stadium. Catering a mix of mobile hatches and carts, with one or two hatches in the old original buildings.
Another thing. When it gets crowded it’s hard to see anything in the PRE stand. It’s not really fit for purpose. The slope isn’t steep enough. Tall people are just rude and stand in front of you.Robin wrote:We do seem to have a glass ceiling where we can't get over 6000 for a league game but as others have said that's very likely down to the lack of seats. If we had bigger capacity I'm sure overall attendance would have been higher tonight, is it worth maybe putting a temp stand in the paddock/canteen area even if it only holds around 500 it would be used for the big games.
Don’t get me started about the cycling facilities, it’s simply a disgrace, treated as second class citizens.
Bulldoze the lot and build a heartless frame off of junction 14. That’ll sort itMalabus wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 17:06Another thing. When it gets crowded it’s hard to see anything in the PRE stand. It’s not really fit for purpose. The slope isn’t steep enough. Tall people are just rude and stand in front of you.Robin wrote:We do seem to have a glass ceiling where we can't get over 6000 for a league game but as others have said that's very likely down to the lack of seats. If we had bigger capacity I'm sure overall attendance would have been higher tonight, is it worth maybe putting a temp stand in the paddock/canteen area even if it only holds around 500 it would be used for the big games.
Don’t get me started about the cycling facilities, it’s simply a disgrace, treated as second class citizens.
-
- Posts: 29852
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Which is why many don’t attend once the seats sell out, which is why shouldn’t sell these seats to away fans.Malabus wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 17:06Another thing. When it gets crowded it’s hard to see anything in the PRE stand. It’s not really fit for purpose. The slope isn’t steep enough. Tall people are just rude and stand in front of you.Robin wrote:We do seem to have a glass ceiling where we can't get over 6000 for a league game but as others have said that's very likely down to the lack of seats. If we had bigger capacity I'm sure overall attendance would have been higher tonight, is it worth maybe putting a temp stand in the paddock/canteen area even if it only holds around 500 it would be used for the big games.
Don’t get me started about the cycling facilities, it’s simply a disgrace, treated as second class citizens.
-
- Posts: 1728
- Joined: 15 Aug 2011, 16:40
https://gleventsstadia.co.uk/wp-content ... Stands.pdf
The 200 seater stand required a footprint of 30m x 4m x 3m and meets UEFA standards. Takes two weeks to install. 30m width could comfortably fit either side of the Main Stand?
400 extra seats. Sure, we'd lose the canteen and open section of the PRE standing, but they haven't sold out for a decade so hard to justify retaining them.
The 200 seater stand required a footprint of 30m x 4m x 3m and meets UEFA standards. Takes two weeks to install. 30m width could comfortably fit either side of the Main Stand?
400 extra seats. Sure, we'd lose the canteen and open section of the PRE standing, but they haven't sold out for a decade so hard to justify retaining them.
-
- Posts: 29852
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Hmm.Jerry St Clair wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 18:56 https://gleventsstadia.co.uk/wp-content ... Stands.pdf
The 200 seater stand required a footprint of 30m x 4m x 3m and meets UEFA standards. Takes two weeks to install. 30m width could comfortably fit either side of the Main Stand?
400 extra seats. Sure, we'd lose the canteen and open section of the PRE standing, but they haven't sold out for a decade so hard to justify retaining them.
Last edited by RegencyCheltenhamSpa on 30 Dec 2023, 20:15, edited 1 time in total.
Which is why many more did attend (that wouldn’t have done otherwise) yesterday. The fact less-more than the other day proves my point!RegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 18:48Which is why many don’t attend once the seats sell out, which is why shouldn’t sell these seats to away fans.Malabus wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 17:06Another thing. When it gets crowded it’s hard to see anything in the PRE stand. It’s not really fit for purpose. The slope isn’t steep enough. Tall people are just rude and stand in front of you.Robin wrote:We do seem to have a glass ceiling where we can't get over 6000 for a league game but as others have said that's very likely down to the lack of seats. If we had bigger capacity I'm sure overall attendance would have been higher tonight, is it worth maybe putting a temp stand in the paddock/canteen area even if it only holds around 500 it would be used for the big games.
Don’t get me started about the cycling facilities, it’s simply a disgrace, treated as second class citizens.
Oh come on RCS, you’re clutching at straws. At least my ‘swap-the-end’ theory has some facts behind it (giving away fans more tickets and us more seats’). Yours is just surmising that if we had 300 more seats left empty we’d have a bigger crowd
-
- Posts: 29852
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
It’s a fact that people didn’t attend because no seats were available. I know two myself!Ben3 wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 19:29Which is why many more did attend (that wouldn’t have done otherwise) yesterday. The fact less-more than the other day proves my point!RegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 18:48Which is why many don’t attend once the seats sell out, which is why shouldn’t sell these seats to away fans.Malabus wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 17:06
Another thing. When it gets crowded it’s hard to see anything in the PRE stand. It’s not really fit for purpose. The slope isn’t steep enough. Tall people are just rude and stand in front of you.
Don’t get me started about the cycling facilities, it’s simply a disgrace, treated as second class citizens.
Oh come on RCS, you’re clutching at straws. At least my ‘swap-the-end’ theory has some facts behind it (giving away fans more tickets and us more seats’). Yours is just surmising that if we had 300 more seats left empty we’d have a bigger crowd
How many people went in the PRE is irrelevant to that fact.
Nor is it about increasing the attendance. It is about enabling more home fans who want to sit to come, and making the experience better for those who do.
Your option may well achieve the same but taking away the PRE is a harder sell to some fans.
Last edited by RegencyCheltenhamSpa on 30 Dec 2023, 20:11, edited 1 time in total.
I do wonder about having any semi-permanent structure in the Canteen area, though... Would there still be enough room to access the food trailer? Would the entry/exit to The Paddock be impeded? For that matter, do we use that gate for egress of any heavy equipment? Would the view from the security tower be impeded? (iirc, that's a fairly important consideration).
I don't know the answers, just putting up some potential problems.
I don't know the answers, just putting up some potential problems.
Where are tall people supposed to stand ?Malabus wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 17:06Another thing. When it gets crowded it’s hard to see anything in the PRE stand. It’s not really fit for purpose. The slope isn’t steep enough. Tall people are just rude and stand in front of you.Robin wrote:We do seem to have a glass ceiling where we can't get over 6000 for a league game but as others have said that's very likely down to the lack of seats. If we had bigger capacity I'm sure overall attendance would have been higher tonight, is it worth maybe putting a temp stand in the paddock/canteen area even if it only holds around 500 it would be used for the big games.
Don’t get me started about the cycling facilities, it’s simply a disgrace, treated as second class citizens.
Crowd was at least 3 people less than last week due to three giants (of mythical proportions) not attending. I know them myself and they verified it to be true.Nham68 wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 20:40Where are tall people supposed to stand ?Malabus wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 17:06Another thing. When it gets crowded it’s hard to see anything in the PRE stand. It’s not really fit for purpose. The slope isn’t steep enough. Tall people are just rude and stand in front of you.Robin wrote:We do seem to have a glass ceiling where we can't get over 6000 for a league game but as others have said that's very likely down to the lack of seats. If we had bigger capacity I'm sure overall attendance would have been higher tonight, is it worth maybe putting a temp stand in the paddock/canteen area even if it only holds around 500 it would be used for the big games.
Don’t get me started about the cycling facilities, it’s simply a disgrace, treated as second class citizens.
Reality is - the seats available/not available made no difference to attendance. The away crowd DID make a difference and should’ve been accommodated at the PRE with home fans having GIGANTUAN levels of comfort
this comment had me in stitchesMalabus wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 17:06Another thing. When it gets crowded it’s hard to see anything in the PRE stand. It’s not really fit for purpose. The slope isn’t steep enough. Tall people are just rude and stand in front of you.Robin wrote:We do seem to have a glass ceiling where we can't get over 6000 for a league game but as others have said that's very likely down to the lack of seats. If we had bigger capacity I'm sure overall attendance would have been higher tonight, is it worth maybe putting a temp stand in the paddock/canteen area even if it only holds around 500 it would be used for the big games.
-
- Posts: 3197
- Joined: 06 Dec 2009, 15:48
There’s a company called stadium solutions who can create bespoke stands. I think they did that small seated away stand at FGR and I’d imagine they could knock up something quite similar to the main stand so you had a raised seated deck and kept the space underneath for kiosks and toilet accessasl wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 19:40 I do wonder about having any semi-permanent structure in the Canteen area, though... Would there still be enough room to access the food trailer? Would the entry/exit to The Paddock be impeded? For that matter, do we use that gate for egress of any heavy equipment? Would the view from the security tower be impeded? (iirc, that's a fairly important consideration).
I don't know the answers, just putting up some potential problems.
I thought maybe the solution was to let him bring his bike in and stand on the saddle. Two birds one stonelongmover wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 21:27this comment had me in stitchesMalabus wrote: ↑30 Dec 2023, 17:06Another thing. When it gets crowded it’s hard to see anything in the PRE stand. It’s not really fit for purpose. The slope isn’t steep enough. Tall people are just rude and stand in front of you.Robin wrote:We do seem to have a glass ceiling where we can't get over 6000 for a league game but as others have said that's very likely down to the lack of seats. If we had bigger capacity I'm sure overall attendance would have been higher tonight, is it worth maybe putting a temp stand in the paddock/canteen area even if it only holds around 500 it would be used for the big games.
-
- Posts: 917
- Joined: 25 Nov 2010, 16:00
I agree with RCS - there are plenty of people (let’s call them casual fans) who won’t come u less they can sit down. The view from the PRE is atrocious even if you can see the pitch. I spent years in there but I much prefer to sit now because I want to see the game properly. If the seats sell out I will stand because I have supported the club all my life, but many people want a seat as a minimum necessity.
The key question to switching ends is: Would the revenue gained by selling seats to home fans at a higher price outweigh the loss of revenue from those who stop attending because they only want to stand up?
Actually in League 1 I think that’s a moot point because there are lots of clubs who would sell out the PRE, but it would be an important question in League 2. Also, could the Colin Farmer be split closer to the PRE, allowing away fans to get maybe 500 seats there? I’m pretty sure league regulations mean we have to provide seats for away fans.
Personally I would much prefer to be behind the goal at the Whaddon Rd end because the view and acoustics would be better.
The key question to switching ends is: Would the revenue gained by selling seats to home fans at a higher price outweigh the loss of revenue from those who stop attending because they only want to stand up?
Actually in League 1 I think that’s a moot point because there are lots of clubs who would sell out the PRE, but it would be an important question in League 2. Also, could the Colin Farmer be split closer to the PRE, allowing away fans to get maybe 500 seats there? I’m pretty sure league regulations mean we have to provide seats for away fans.
Personally I would much prefer to be behind the goal at the Whaddon Rd end because the view and acoustics would be better.