Same time next week, Shade...?Shade wrote:I despise football.
Refs are always s#!t. Cheltenham and England.
I despise football.
Sent from my SM-G9860 using Tapatalk
Moderators: Admin, Ralph, asl, Robin
Beat Iran and Wales , surely not a great measure of poor or excellent?asl wrote: ↑12 Dec 2022, 11:43 I don't know how anyone can say *any* of the England players had a poor tournament, tbh... The aberration against the USA aside (when Maguire still had a good game), I thought we were excellent. Against France, I worried for Walker - but he did well to keep Mbappe quiet, despite not being at his best against Senegal. Maguire looked a new man (I'd never have taken him) and Stones and Shaw did ok alongside him. Pickford was well protected but still did his job on the few occasions he had to. The midfield was frankly superb and Henderson held the hands of the youngsters who will be England's best for years to come. Kane did what he's best at and, while not scoring as many as everyone hoped, did provide plenty of assists.
Suspect all the racist bigots were very confused about what to do after that penalty was missed...can you imagine the abuse if Saka had done that?
Sent from my SM-G9860 using Tapatalk
2014, drew with Costa Rica, lost to Uruguay and Italy.Ihearye wrote: ↑12 Dec 2022, 14:14Beat Iran and Wales , surely not a great measure of poor or excellent?asl wrote: ↑12 Dec 2022, 11:43 I don't know how anyone can say *any* of the England players had a poor tournament, tbh... The aberration against the USA aside (when Maguire still had a good game), I thought we were excellent. Against France, I worried for Walker - but he did well to keep Mbappe quiet, despite not being at his best against Senegal. Maguire looked a new man (I'd never have taken him) and Stones and Shaw did ok alongside him. Pickford was well protected but still did his job on the few occasions he had to. The midfield was frankly superb and Henderson held the hands of the youngsters who will be England's best for years to come. Kane did what he's best at and, while not scoring as many as everyone hoped, did provide plenty of assists.
Suspect all the racist bigots were very confused about what to do after that penalty was missed...can you imagine the abuse if Saka had done that?
Sent from my SM-G9860 using Tapatalk
Always wonder be it rugby or football, the weight that can be given to reigning champions after 4 years have elapsed. I believe only 2 or 3 teams have ever won consecutive world cups. Which would seem to point to the form of 4 years ago not actually meaning too muchShade wrote: ↑12 Dec 2022, 16:352014, drew with Costa Rica, lost to Uruguay and Italy.Ihearye wrote: ↑12 Dec 2022, 14:14Beat Iran and Wales , surely not a great measure of poor or excellent?asl wrote: ↑12 Dec 2022, 11:43 I don't know how anyone can say *any* of the England players had a poor tournament, tbh... The aberration against the USA aside (when Maguire still had a good game), I thought we were excellent. Against France, I worried for Walker - but he did well to keep Mbappe quiet, despite not being at his best against Senegal. Maguire looked a new man (I'd never have taken him) and Stones and Shaw did ok alongside him. Pickford was well protected but still did his job on the few occasions he had to. The midfield was frankly superb and Henderson held the hands of the youngsters who will be England's best for years to come. Kane did what he's best at and, while not scoring as many as everyone hoped, did provide plenty of assists.
Suspect all the racist bigots were very confused about what to do after that penalty was missed...can you imagine the abuse if Saka had done that?
Sent from my SM-G9860 using Tapatalk
2010, drew with USA and Algeria, beat Slovenia by 1 goal, stuffed by Germany
2006, beat Paraguay by 1 goal, beat Trinidad and Tobago by 2 goals, drew with Sweden, lost to Portugal.
Yeah, by comparison, winning 6-2 against Iran, 3-0 against Wales, and 3-0 against Senegal, and coming so close to at least taking the reigning champions and favourites to extra time in a World Cup QF is a measure of poor or excellent.
Totally agree with the Portugal game. Portugal beat us on pens after the winker got Rooney sent off. Just another example of England stepping up in a big game and playing well, but then losing on penalties after an injustice.asl wrote: ↑12 Dec 2022, 16:56 I don't claim to remember all of those matches, but I do remember several of them and we were pish. One exception would be the Portugal game when Cashley Cole had the game of his life, had prime Ronaldo in his pocket and no way deserved to be on the losing side. Apart from the USA game, how many of our performances this time were as poor as most of those?
Sent from my SM-G9860 using Tapatalk
People talk about the curse of ITV. How many of those above were shown on ITV?Shade wrote: ↑13 Dec 2022, 16:16
All in all, since the semis of Italia 90 (as I was curious to see just how c!#p we have done overall):
92 group (bottom)
94 didn't qualify (couldn't beat San Marino by enough goals)
96 SF (Germany on pens)
98 2R (Argentina on pens)
00 group (3rd in group, above Germany, though!)
02 QF (Ronaldinho's lucky free kick for Brazil)
04 QF (beaten by France in the group, 2 Zidane 90+ goals, Portugal beat us on pens)
06 QF (Portugal on pens)
08 didn't qualify (wally with the brolly)
10 2R (Germany, 4-1)
12 QF (Italy on pens)
14 group (bottom)
16 2R (Iceland...)
18 SF (Croatia on pens)
20 F (Italy on pens)
22 QF (France, not on pens, thankfully)
Knocked out of 8 tournaments on penalties, including 1990...I think I'm glad Kane missed in normal time to save us going through that again. Twice we haven't qualified, three times out in the group stage, 3 second rounds, 5 quarters, 2 semis and a final.
In 2014, the loss to Uruguay in the group stages was really equivalent to be knocked out in the later stages. Do you know if that was on ITV?Shade wrote: ↑14 Dec 2022, 20:46 My brother has been on about the ITV curse for about 10 years. Yet to be proved much wrong.
Tournament knockout games we lost on ITV, from memory;
96, 98, 04, 06, 12, 18, "20" (21, but was also on BBC) and 22. So that would be 8/11 knockout games, leaving 02, 10 and 16 on BBC.
I could be wrong on a couple, and a couple of others might have been on ITV as well, but I think that's mostly right.
However, we haven't beaten a "big" in-form nation on either channel, really. ITV just keep getting the big matches, and we lose them.
I want to say it was, but it's just a feeling.Red Duke wrote: ↑15 Dec 2022, 18:18In 2014, the loss to Uruguay in the group stages was really equivalent to be knocked out in the later stages. Do you know if that was on ITV?Shade wrote: ↑14 Dec 2022, 20:46 My brother has been on about the ITV curse for about 10 years. Yet to be proved much wrong.
Tournament knockout games we lost on ITV, from memory;
96, 98, 04, 06, 12, 18, "20" (21, but was also on BBC) and 22. So that would be 8/11 knockout games, leaving 02, 10 and 16 on BBC.
I could be wrong on a couple, and a couple of others might have been on ITV as well, but I think that's mostly right.
However, we haven't beaten a "big" in-form nation on either channel, really. ITV just keep getting the big matches, and we lose them.
He should have had a yellow for throwing the ball away, in my opinion. I saw a tweet yesterday about choosing who you want to win between France and Argentina is like choosing between a certain type of people that nobody likes, but I was all for France (despite Mbappe's behaviour against England). Can't stand the unsportsmanlike Argies and Martinez just showed everything that there is to dislike about them in the shoot-out and award ceremonies. Plus we have been at war with Argentina a lot more recently than France...and all the fangirling over Messi makes me sick.